Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are diverse powders, you will find that in lots of circumstances, where one of these is outlined another will be at the same time. Also, you'll find there is a reasonably consistent romance concerning them in regards to mentioned loads.
I have applied H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There aren't quite a few cartridges that I utilize it for as I appear to be usually to gravitate to other powders. Nevertheless, I can't say that it would not get the job done. It is just that Several other powders function improved for any supplied cartridge. For instance, while in the 280, H4831 gave me good velocity and very high-quality teams with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Nevertheless, RL19 was marginally superior in precision, although the velocity was almost equivalent.
Can they be interchanged without having anxieties other then using regular load procedures when switching from ton to lot?
243, and some of the loads I have commenced with encompass, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I am likely to shoot the IMR7828 loads to start with, followed by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises if the H-4831sc loads display a shotgun pattern! Who knows, I just could discover a use for it All things considered.
IMR powders also preform nicely for me with one noteworthy exception. Each of the chrongraphing I have done with them suggests the velecity is consistant over 32 levels but starts to change when the temp starts to fall. The closer to zero I get the greater they fluctuate. I've witnessed around 250 fps in a ten shot string with my 243 and 223 inside the Wintertime time all-around listed here. Haven't observed this with some of the other powders.
It is probably that no even further dialogue is required, through which scenario we propose starting a brand new thread. If nonetheless you're feeling your response is needed it is possible to still do so.
I am utilizing it with a 210 h4831sc Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as precise. RL22 did perfectly but I used to be a little bit concerned about temp stability. I think I'm at seventy two grains and get all over 2850ish fps
excaliber stated: I have observed the precise opposite to generally be genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally correct powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
WA I might advise a slower burner that will give superior situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you happen to be loading heavies lengthy.
Liberalism; The impossible but approved Idea that it's completely attainable to choose up a turd via the clean finish.
Kansas Metropolis, MO I'd personally grab whatsoever is out there at the moment. I’ve employed the two even though with my check out load and didn’t see something distinctive h4831sc load data efficiency clever.
It really is probably that no more discussion is necessary, through which case we propose commencing a new thread. If on the other hand you're feeling your reaction is required you may nevertheless accomplish that.
While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will see that in several h4831sc load data occasions, wherever one of these is shown another will likely be too. Also, you'll find there is a reasonably dependable marriage involving them with reference to detailed loads.
I sawed one particular in fifty percent to find out how thick the jackets have been, and so they had been effortlessly twice as thick to be a fifty-grain hollow position was. Ditto to the 64-grain Power Point, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie canine or woodchucks. You now know anything I learn about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know nearly anything in any way regarding the 223. I doubt that you're going to get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know how it goes.